We already spent $1 trillion fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now, many politicians want to start another war in Libya. It doesn’t matter what they call it, we invaded a foreign country and attacked their military. That’s a war. Even if they had attacked us first and there are was a need for retaliation, that would still be a war although justified.
Originally, the stated goal was to stop Qadhafi from killing civilians, but the goal is really regime change. President Obama hasn’t learned anything from President George W. Bush who should have listened to his father. During the Persian Gulf war, President George H. Bush was smart enough to chase Iraq out of Kuwait and stop at the border.
The White House likes to talk about how this is a coalition with other countries and how the first strike was a collaboration with Britain. Rarely mentioned is the fact that the US launched 97% of the cruise missiles with only 3% launched by Britain. This is nothing more than a mere token of support. Britain was smart enough to let us spend the money. The White House stupidly thought that the Arab league was supporting us and now, after the military strike on Qadhafi, the Arab League is against us. That is hardly a surprise and maybe the White House expected that.
We can’t keep paying for wars and this one will lead throughout the Arab world. Why didn’t the White House asked Congress for approval to start military action against Libya? Can we afford more wars? Of course, we can easily afford another war by eliminating Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. In fact, we might even be able to afford a couple of more wars. What a great idea!
Why do we continue to send US citizens to be killed and maimed and continue to spend money fighting for oil instead of spending money exploring for new oil sources and alternative energy sources? There is something very wrong with American politicians who want immediate results to our energy needs instead of long-term planning for the future.
There are only two reasons that could have precipitated this military action. One is for oil and the other is a strategy to attack Iran. By attacking Libya to assist the Libyan rebels, this could encourage uprisings in other Arab nations leading to a fall of dictators like dominoes. The White House may be helping that this will lead to uprisings in Iran where we can once again begin military action with the “support” of other countries and accomplish the one regime change the White House is hoping for.
There is a long history of using the enemies of our enemies to combat our enemies. History has shown that the only outcome was that they all became our enemies only better armed and we paid for it. It is far better to leave our enemies alone.
If we are going to spend money and lives to really help and save innocent people, there are far better times and places to do so. Why are we getting involved with Libya when nothing was ever done to prevent the atrocities in Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Zimbabwe and other African countries. These atrocities have been far worse than anything in Libya.