Categories
Gripes

Will GoDaddy.com Founder Kill More Elephants?

GoDaddy.com founder Bob Parsons was just interviewed on CNN and tried to explain that shooting an elephant was a benefit for the people in Africa who need to eat (The elephant had been trampling their crops).  He offered no apologies for killing the elephant and referring to his benevolent actions, he stated that he doesn’t see anyone traveling to Africa with him to help.

I certainly won’t be traveling with Bob Parsons to shoot elephants in Africa.  I love shooting and have several guns, but I don’t shoot animals and certainly not elephants which are probably more intelligent than him.

Bob Parsons blamed the whole incident on a small group of people who are very vocal in this country, I assume he means PETA.  When asked if he will go back to Africa, he stated that he will absolutely go back to do it again.

As the founder of GoDaddy.com, Bob Parsons can afford to donate the money necessary to provide the means to produce clean water and food for the villagers.  He is just using the villagers as an excuse to shoot an elephant so he can take a picture posing next to a dead elephant showing how courageous he was to engage in elephant in battle.

I have spent a few thousand dollars on domain names with GoDaddy.com but will never again.

CNN article: http://www.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/04/01/godaddy.peta.protest/index.html?hpt=T2

WebProNews reported that the Bob Parsons video was mysteriously sanitized to look a little less horrible and to remove references to GoDaddy.com, but that doesn’t change the fact that he’s an ass.

WebProNews also reported that NameCheap used the opportunity to raise over $20,000 for Save the Elephants and  Venovix launched a “NoDaddy” campaign with a similar goal, looking to raise money for the International Wildlife Foundation.  I’m happy to provide links to these two companies NameCheap and Venovix.

 

Categories
Federal Budget & Government Waste

Libya – yet another war!

We already spent $1 trillion fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Now, many politicians want to start another war in Libya.  It doesn’t matter what they call it, we invaded a foreign country and attacked their military.   That’s a war.  Even if they had attacked us first and there are was a need for retaliation, that would still be a war although justified.

Originally, the stated goal was to stop Qadhafi from killing civilians, but the goal is really regime change.  President Obama hasn’t learned anything from President George W. Bush who should have listened to his father.  During the Persian Gulf war, President George H.  Bush was smart enough to chase Iraq out of Kuwait and stop at the border.

The White House likes to talk about how this is a coalition with other countries and how the first strike was a collaboration with Britain.  Rarely mentioned is the fact that the US launched 97% of the cruise missiles with only 3% launched by Britain.  This is nothing more than a mere token of support.  Britain was smart enough to let us spend the money.  The White House stupidly thought that the Arab league was supporting us and now, after the military strike on Qadhafi, the Arab League is against us.  That is hardly a surprise and maybe the White House expected that.

We can’t keep paying for wars and this one will lead throughout the Arab world.  Why didn’t the White House asked Congress for approval to start military action against Libya?  Can we afford more wars?  Of course, we can easily afford another war by eliminating Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.  In fact, we might even be able to afford a couple of more wars.  What a great idea!

Why do we continue to send US citizens to be killed and maimed and continue to spend money fighting for oil instead of spending money exploring for new oil sources and alternative energy sources?  There is something very wrong with American politicians who want immediate results to our energy needs instead of long-term planning for the future.

There are only two reasons that could have precipitated this military action.  One is for oil and the other is a strategy to attack Iran.  By attacking Libya to assist the Libyan rebels, this could encourage uprisings in other Arab nations leading to a fall of dictators like dominoes.  The White House may be helping that this will lead to uprisings in Iran where we can once again begin military action with the “support” of other countries and accomplish the one regime change the White House is hoping for.

There is a long history of using the enemies of our enemies to combat our enemies.  History has shown that the only outcome was that they all became our enemies only better armed and we paid for it.  It is far better to leave our enemies alone.

If we are going to spend money and lives to really help and save innocent people, there are far better times and places to do so.  Why are we getting involved with Libya when nothing was ever done to prevent the atrocities in Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Zimbabwe and other African countries.  These atrocities have been far worse than anything in Libya.

 

Categories
Federal Budget & Government Waste

How to Cut Taxes and Stop Wasting Money

How to cut taxes and stop wasting money.  We could probably cut federal income taxes by 80% just by ending waste in probably more than 100,000 areas.  Following are some of the areas where money can be saved  (I will keep adding as I find new items).

Afghanistan:  Save $65 billion + $7 billion + increases per year (the cost is increasing every year). The cost of the war in Afghanistan is now costing us more than Iraq.  According to Defence Talk, the White House is requesting $65 billion for Afghanistan and $61 billion for Iraq in 2010.  According to the 60 minutes interview, the Afghanistan war will cost us $7 billion. In the interview, Ambassador Peter W. Galbraith said the Afghan Police force consists of officers who are illiterate, drug addicts and corrupt and it will be impossible for the police force to be successful for another 100 years.  Lt. General William Caldwell blamed the problem of corruption on the low salaries for Afghan police.  We can’t afford to be in Afghanistan forever.  We should just pull out now and save the money.  Unfortunately, we can’t force democracy down the throats of every country. Democracy requires an educated population.

Iraq: Save $61 billion + increases per year? We never should have gotten into this war and if President Bush had only consulted with his father, we probably never would have. Unfortunately, now that we have eliminated a stable strategic government, we need to make sure that we build a new stable government. Consequently, we’re going to have to keep spending money in Iraq but I’m sure there are many ways to save.

Medicare & Medicaid: Save $60+ billion per year.The biggest problem with Medicare and Medicaid is fraud. According to the Coalition against Insurance Fraud, as of 2008, Medicare and Medicaid loses “an estimated $60 billion or more annually to fraud…”. The site also claims that “Medicare spends less than two tenths of a cent of every dollar of its $456 billion annual budget combating fraud, waste and abuse.” Apparently, because there is so much fraud they don’t have any money left to combat it! There is a solution. They can create a volunteer law enforcement agency, similar to Auxiliary Police and Reserve Police to do the work. There are many CPAs, attorneys, retired law enforcement officers, and others who would volunteer their time. I’m one of them. I am a practicing attorney in the Commanding Officer of Communications for the Nassau County Auxiliary Police.

Categories
Computers

Bug #1 The Microsoft Bug

The bug: Microsoft has a majority market share in the desktop PC marketplace.
Ubuntu Linux is designed to fix this bug.

You are invited to submit your opinion on the topic of computers or reversing the Microsoft dominance in favor of Ubuntu Linux.


Categories
Gun Control

Now, You Can Have a Federal Gun Permit to Carry Your Handgun Anywhere

Now, by Decree of The Dictator, you can have a Federal handgun permit to carry in every state. At least you could if I was a real dictator! Unfortunately, this will never happen because the NRA is too stubborn to do anything right.

Instead of wasting their time fighting reasonable gun control legislation, the NRA should be in favor of gun control as long as it is Federal and comes with a Federal carry permit. Of course, the NRA would oppose federal standards which would likely have to be higher than those of many states.

Just after writing this, I found out that a bill came to a vote in the Senate that would have allowed someone with a permit to carry a concealed handgun in one state to carry it in 48 states.

A strong majority of the Senate, in a 58-39 vote, supported the measure but was two votes short of the 60 votes needed to add the measure as an amendment to a defense bill. Opponents said it would force states with tough concealed weapon permit restrictions to let in gun carriers from states with weak restrictions. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California said “It’s extremely dangerous policy”, noting that California demands fingerprinting, federal background checks, a training course, and verification by a local sheriff before issuing a permit to carry a concealed gun.

The bill may have passed if it increased restrictions to equal those of the toughest states. I’m not concerned about meeting those restrictions, I just want to be able to carry my gun anywhere I want. Unfortunately, the NRA has a “don’t give an inch” policy instead of a policy of negotiation.

Handguns should be controlled by a Federal permit which would allow a permit holder to carry a concealed handgun anywhere in the US. With a few reasonable changes, everyone would be a lot safer. Some pistol license requirements should be relaxed and others should be increased. Handgun permits should be restricted to people who meet tougher qualifications to carry a handgun but make it easier for people to obtain without proof that it is needed. People who want a handgun, but may not be able to prove financial necessity should still be allowed to obtain a permit. People with criminal convictions and psychiatric histories should not be allowed to obtain or carry handguns.

I have a CCW business carry permit which allows me to carry my handgun anywhere in New York State, but not New York City and not in any other state. I would like to be able to carry my gun anywhere I want. If I need it for protection in New York, why would I not need it in other states as well? If I can be trusted to carry a concealed handgun in New York State, why not in other states, and why not in New York City?

I used to work in the diamond business with my father and he wanted me to travel around the country to sell diamonds to jewelry stores. I never did because of the danger involved. Sometimes, diamond salespeople get robbed while visiting jewelry stores in other states. I have a friend who traveled to Florida to sell colored stones to jewelry stores. He was staying at the house of a friend and when he left in the morning to go to a jewelry store he was approached by a robber when he walked out of the house. Although he gave all his diamonds to the robber, he was shot in the stomach anyway. Fortunately, he survived.

Until 2004, even police officers were not allowed to carry their handguns to other states. At least, they can do that now. Why shouldn’t you or I have a Federal permit to carry a concealed handgun anywhere we go?

Categories
Health Insurance

National Health Insurance For Everyone!

The cost of health insurance premiums, not the cost of healthcare, is the next major economic crisis this country faces. As premiums increase, healthy people who can’t afford the increase drop their insurance; as healthy people drop their insurance, the medical risk is spread among a smaller group of people making claims.  The more people drop their health insurance, the faster premiums go up.

Vote in the poll after reading this article!

Health insurance premiums are increasing every year and every year, the premium increase is substantially larger than the previous year’s premium increase.  The result is that health insurance premiums are rising much faster than inflation and faster than the cost of healthcare.  Eventually, the health insurance industry has to implode.

Think health care is too expensive? So what?  Why shouldn’t we have the most expensive health care?  With all of the money wasted in the last few wars and in other ways, we could fund health care for every generation to come.  There are many factors which cause health care to be expensive, but I will deal with those problems another time.

Some people argue that national health insurance will cost a lot of money, but this is simply not true. What will happen is that the cost will be reduced and that cost will be transferred from one pocket to another.

Health care costs will be reduced: People without health insurance get their medical treatment at the emergency room from hospitals which are required to provide medical treatment without regard to insurance coverage. This results in people going to the hospital for a simple cold or sore throat which uses up hospital resources and costs 10 times more than what it would cost to see a doctor in a private office.

The Cost of healthcare will be transferred, not increased: Hospitals must recover this cost somewhere, so they charge people with insurance more money than they would ordinarily need to. This means that people (or employers) with private health insurance are paying for medical treatment for people who do not have health insurance in the form of higher and skyrocketing health insurance premiums. With national health insurance, the cost of medical care for people without insurance will be transferred from private health insurance premiums to the government and your taxes.

The government doesn’t pay for food why should it pay for health care? One politician posited that argument, but there are distinct differences.  Food is relatively inexpensive and can be afforded by even the poorest individuals in this country.  People can survive on food basics such as vegetables and do not need filet mignon.  Healthcare is expensive.  The fact that everyone is entitled to receive health care with or without insurance causes people who cannot or do not want to afford it to go without health insurance which costs everyone a lot more money than providing national health insurance.

The cost of health care has nothing to do with the issue of whether we should have national health insurance coverage, it is the acceleration of premium increases.  The biggest reason for the increase in health insurance premiums is the very principle of insurance, which is to spread the risk of a few people among a much larger group of people.  Health insurance is the only insurance which you want to use.  You certainly don’t want to collect on your life insurance!

When I pay my health insurance premium, I subsidize those people who are sick or injured because I never make a claim.  When the cost of my health insurance premium is so high that I decide to drop my health coverage, the health insurance company loses the contribution of my money and now the risk is spread among a smaller number of people.

When I drop my health insurance coverage, I will not be the only one.  Other people who don’t make claims will also decide that they can no longer afford to pay for the coverage.  People who can still afford the coverage will continue to pay for their health insurance until their premium reaches a point that they too decide to cancel their health coverage.  Eventually, all that is left is a smaller group of  people all of whom are making claims.  When that happens, there will be no difference between the cost of health insurance and paying for your own medical bills.

In approximately 1998, my health insurance premium (single/individual non-group) was approximately $225 and the next premium increase was $25/month.  By May 2001, my monthly health insurance premium with Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield was $337.65 per month.  By April 2008, my monthly premium with Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield was $861.99.  My health insurance policy renews in April and this April 2009, my health insurance premium was increased by $215.79 per month to a total of $1,077.78 per month.

President Obama said that the cost of medical insurance will double in 10 years.  However, this year, my monthly increase was almost 10 times greater than it was 10 years ago.  Most alarming is that the monthly premium increase for 2009 was almost double the increase of 2008.  At this rate, my monthly premium increase will bring my health insurance premium to over $1,400 per month by 2010 and nearly $1,800 per month by 2011.  Don’t forget, I’m single.  A friend of mine who is married saw his premium with Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield increase to nearly $2,800 per month this year.  Not too many people can afford this.

For most people, it was unaffordable at the rate I was paying a few years ago.  Since I could not afford health insurance coverage in the near future, I decided to drop my health insurance policy with Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield now and start saving my money.  Of course, without my monthly contribution of $1,077.78 per month this year, Empire’s health insurance premiums will have to increase a little more for everyone else.

The question is not whether we need national health insurance, but when it will happen.  More people than ever before are going without health insurance.  When a medical catastrophe strikes, uninsured people can lose their homes and both hospitals and doctors will see many of their bills unpaid.  When medical bills go unpaid, the losses must be made up by charging more for services.

While doctors don’t have the power to negotiate higher prices with insurance companies, hospitals do.  When the insurance companies won’t negotiate with hospitals, the hospitals refuse to accept the insurance.  This has now been happening at an alarming rate.  Even doctors are now following the lead of hospitals and refusing to accept health insurance policies from major companies such as Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield.  When hospitals and doctors refuse to accept payment directly from the health insurer (accepting assignment), patients have to make up the difference.

Some people have argued that some medical services available with private health insurance will no longer be available with national health insurance. This is simply not true.  In fact, the opposite is true.  There are many stories in the news all the time about private health insurance companies which refused to pay for desperately needed medical treatment by someone who is dying.  They often create delays hoping that the patient will die before the treatment will have to be paid.  My father was on Medicare and never had a problem getting medical treatment.  Almost every doctor takes Medicare.

Because my father did not want to pay for excluded services under Medicare part B, he signed up with HIP which provides full coverage at no charge.  He has been receiving excellent medical care by some of the best doctors in New York and he has not been declined any tests or procedures which he needed.  Additionally, this shows that private health insurance can easily and successfully compete with government provided Medicare.

In addition to people who will not be able to afford health insurance now or in the near future, employees who are laid off are usually unable to afford cheap group health insurance coverage which is available for 18 months under COBRA because they no longer have any income. When COBRA ends and the health insurance premium is three times higher, it certainly is not affordable. It’s no wonder that President Obama said that 14,000 Americans are losing their insurance every day.

The acceleration of health insurance premium increases will quickly come to a point which causes enough people to cancel their health insurance coverage resulting in the next financial and social catastrophe to affect this country.

As dictator I would issue a Decree providing national health insurance for every citizen and permanent resident (green card holder).  Unfortunately, President Obama is only a president and can’t accomplish what a dictator can.  I would afford health insurance coverage to everyone that is the same health insurance coverage currently provided to US Senators, Congress and the President.  Why should U.S. citizens get anything less?

The cost for this will come from taxes.  There is plenty of money to pay for everyone’s health insurance coverage by cutting a lot of the waste out of the US budget.  Be sure to visit IAmDictator.com occasionally to find out where I will cut the budget so everyone can have health insurance coverage.

Al Franken discussing national healthcare with an angry mob

Poll Question

Should everyone have Medicare or Medicare Advantage Plan?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Philip L. Franckel, Esq.
The Original Dictator